The Truth Tracker

“Tracking The Truth, Because the Mainstream Media Won’t”

Typical Liberal Attacks on Conservatives!!

with 18 comments

I find it so fun how the left has NO problem bashing, mocking and making fun of folks who are conservatives.  Yet if they are offended in anyway, then the sky is going to come falling down.  I mean I love reading titles and as soon as you’re done reading them, you know exactly what to expect.  Here are two from our local newspaper in Lancaster, PA “The fearful world of conservatives” and “A liberal idea of patriotism“.  Now if you can’t come up with an idea of what to expect from those titles then you are most likely out of the political loop.

Well sometimes I get so sick and tired of hearing the same arguments and complaints time after time, that I end up deciding to voice my little opinion.  After reading the title (A liberal idea of patriotism) by Gil Smart in the Lancaster Sunday News over the July 4th weekend I knew I’d be in for some interesting reading.  I read Mr. Smarts column, mainly to get a kick out of the continuous talking points he continues to spew out from the Liberal MSM.  I wouldn’t be surprised if Mr. Smart doesn’t visit the TalkingPointsMemo website daily!!  I mean his statements throughout a majority of his columns; look like he read from some official Liberal Talking Points Manuel.

First he tries bashing Glenn Beck by only picking the part of the quote he desired, by printing: “Heck, conservative yakker Glenn Beck last month said rather than let the Supreme Court permit terrorist suspects (key word) to go free, we should just shoot them all.”  Well to start off with here is the FULL quote to which Mr. Smart decided to cherry pick from:

(GLENN: Joe, I’m saying this in jest but it really is that, isn’t it? I mean, it’s really; it’s going down that road, isn’t it? Holy cow, Joe just said this decision is frightening when you read the language. This court has done some frightening, frightening. With Guantanamo, gang, I got news for you. We’re in deep trouble with Guantanamo.  We can’t do this; we’re going to give these guys access to our courts? Let me say something. If I were President of the United States, I would go on national television and say, ladies and gentlemen of America, the Supreme Court said that we don’t have Guantanamo, so that is over, we’re going to release all of them but I want you to know from here on out our policy is to not have prisoners. We’re going to shoot them all in the head. If we think that they are against us, we’re going to shoot them and kill them, period.  Because that’s the only thing we’ve got going for us is we can put them away and get information.

See now to the average reader, who Mr. Smart assumes won’t double check his MSM mentality, and liberal biased attacks, that would make you thing Glenn Beck is a horrible individual.  But on to the contrary, Mr. Beck does plenty of positive things and gives you information that the Main Stream Media won’t.

Then Mr. Smart seems to think we should not go spreading Americas (Ideals) around the world.  Oh so then we should just forget trying to help other countries out?  Yeah that’s a great idea; we just keep to ourselves and not bother other countries with the Ideals that work here in the U.S.  We’ll just let them suffer and who cares what happens to them right?  It’s not our problem just let all the countries go crying to China, Russia, and all those other great countries that will have their best interests in mind.

Let’s see, does anyone know why those 2 countries or any other countries would gladly step in our place to help out those struggling and/or dictated countries?  Well I’ll try and take a stab at the most possible and logical answer(s).  Could it be that any country that doesn’t want to see the U.S. help other struggling countries, know darn well that if things came down to push and shove, those struggling countries will remember who extended a helping hand, and who wants to see their economies and countries prosper just as much as we want to see our own country prosper.  Or in the case of war, (OH WAIT, SORRY FOLKS I AM USING THE TYPICAL RIGHT WING SCARE TACTIC) who do you believe those newly prospering countries will assist first?  I have a guess; they will return the favors, and assistance that was given to them by any country other than the U.S., because we should not put our nose where it doesn’t belong according to those lovely leftist liberals.

Oh and then Mr. Smart for the 2nd week in a row, tells us that we should in essence go back to our Sept. 10th 2001 mind sets that (It Won’t Happen to us!)  He says that conservatives think we should go around and bully everyone, “But conservatives will tell you we have no choice but to wage the grand crusade, because the terrorists threaten our very existence.” So does this mean Conservatives are wrong for wanting to protect our country from those, who as Mr. Smart mentioned “threaten our very existence”?  Sounds like it to me, but trust me his statements of which he can freely speak and express, show how naive folks can be.  “And see, liberals reject that. The terrorists aren’t going to destroy us — and in any case, you don’t defend American ideals by undermining them. America is better than that, stronger than that — or has been. And must be, again.” I’d like to hear him say that to those families who lost loved ones on 9/11, let’s hear you tell them that was a once and done attack and your loved ones were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.  That is just about what I take from a statement like that.  (OPPS SORRY FOLKS THERE I GO AGAIN USING A TYPICAL RIGHT WING SCARE TACTIC)  I apologize and will try to work on that flaw of mine. LOL

Well folks I just like to let the liberal loving media out there know that just because they think we are dumb and should listen to their talking points, doesn’t mean we are or that we will.  I hope my input can be of some help to even just one person.

God Bless you and our Country,
The Truth Tracker
Jason R. Bootie

Written by truthtracker

July 8, 2008 at 2:40 PM

18 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. but there is no difference between a bad Conservative and a bad Liberal in fact, anyway


    July 8, 2008 at 2:42 PM

  2. Well said. You can do that with almost every single liberal article. Notice how they never mention much about the actual constitution or declaration of independence. Just the “idias” of our founding fathers.


    July 8, 2008 at 3:32 PM

  3. Thank you very much Tony. And you are so right. They make it easy to do with most articles, sometimes we just need to bring it light more so than others!!!


    July 8, 2008 at 3:45 PM

  4. The terrorists aren’t going to destroy us

    No, they will probably not destroy Mr. Smart. But then again, the sailors on the U.S.S. Cole probably thought that too. And so did those who died in the Kobar Towers. And the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. And I’m sure the passengers on those 4 airplanes used to destroy buildings on 9/11 were not thinking that terrorists were hell bent on destroying them.

    The problem with Mr. Smart is that he never left his September 10th attitude. It’s shameful.

    Conservative Belle

    July 8, 2008 at 5:36 PM

  5. I spent half of my life supirting the mostly lying, hypocritcal, carnal, selfish, uncaring, bullying, control freaks, ungodly conservatives and whenI firsthand saw again what they were really a decade agao I admit do like rather an honest liberal


    July 8, 2008 at 8:17 PM

  6. Hello nonconformer thanks for visiting the site. I just ask that if you are going to take the time to show and express your disagreement with my opinions (which is fine with me), that you make an effort to use grammer and phrases easier to understand.
    Thanks again for visiting and I appreciate the time you spend checking in.

    God Bless,


    July 8, 2008 at 8:56 PM

  7. Re: “I’d like to hear him say that to those families who losted (lost) loved ones on 9/11, let’s hear you tell them that was a once and done attack and your loved ones were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

    I would like to say to the families who lost loved ones on 9/11 that it will not make you feel better — nor will it help to prevent further attacks like 9/11 — to arrest people who had nothing to do with 9/11 and had nothing to do with terrorism. And it does no good to hold the people who had nothing to do with terrorism and to prevent them from showing that they really are not terrorists. And, as a result, it does not help you or help in the struggle against terrorism to fail to give the accused terrorists (both those who really did commit the crimes and those who did not) the right to habeas corpus and fair trials.

    The reason, as with all crimes, is that when you arrest the wrong people and fail to find out that you made a mistake through a trial THEN THE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY COMMITTED THE CRIME ARE STILL AT LARGE.

    But if we give the accused fair trials and prove that they really are terrorists, then we strike a fundamental blow at terrorism. Right now, the terrorists are probably mocking us, saying things like: “Hey, the Americans arrested some 700 people as terrorists and took them to Guantanamo, and probably two-thirds or three-fifths of those who were arrested weren’t terrorists at all. What jerks the Americans are.”


    July 9, 2008 at 12:23 AM

  8. Smrstrauss-

    Hey I don’t see why you don’t find the families and tell them that. I mean with the ability to find out the loved ones lost on 9/11 and where to find their families, you should have no problems spewing the Liberal (who cares what happens till we get attacked again) Rhetoric.

    I just pity the families who would be willing to listen….


    July 9, 2008 at 3:50 AM

  9. >> Hello nonconformer thanks for visiting the site. I just ask that if you are going to take the time to show and express your disagreement with my opinions (which is fine with me), that you make an effort to use grammer and phrases easier to understand.

    and to me this sounds the beginning next of an excuse for the too often Conservative censorships I experience in Conservatives churches, on the net too those that I write and expose often.. grammar, speller checkers, though police next ehh? I have been bloging for 20 years and the most abusive oppositions were mostly the Conservatives too.


    July 9, 2008 at 2:52 PM

  10. HAHA Still not sure how you think I am censoring you? Bashing or Attacking you. I don’t remember me doing any of that. Please do let myself and everyone else know where I did that. Or are you assuming that I’ll be the same as all your past encounters with Conservatives?? And all I did was ask to try and keep a better eye with making it easier for folks to read and understand your responses. I have not and will not (as long as comments are with-in reason) delete any of your comments..

    God bless,


    July 9, 2008 at 3:24 PM

  11. Now had said clearly it sounds like…

    a Church I helped to close down next had said if I would go to their church they would call the police..

    a Conservative Premier Ernie Evwes who had lost relection next because of it had called the polcie cause I had sent to him asking him how come he was committing adultery while preaching family values?

    a AOG pentacostal supporter last week deleted ny negative messages about his bullying but only on his site now..

    and look at the bad acts of the bulkly pastors of the Toronto airport church and many other Conservative pastors still too.

    Conservative censors, thought police are too much too common..

    is this simple and clear enough for you ?


    July 9, 2008 at 3:31 PM

  12. yes much better thank you!! Sorry you have had this issues of folks calling the police or threats.


    July 9, 2008 at 3:51 PM

  13. The single biggest number of opposition, complaints for thousands of my posts that I have next gotten back is when I rightfully write that smoking is a sin, doing drugs is sinful, porn is sinful, and using any taxpayers money to buy alcohol now as well. even from the so called Conservative Christians

    Hey I have not only been bashed, bullied by elected politicians, bad Conservatives now too, and 6 times the really bad politicians in Canada had now called the police against me for my writing to them and to the others, done basically to try to falsely intimidate me, to obstruct justice, and to try to stop me writing anymore truths to news editors, others.. but decades later I am still writing to all too the truth.. One Liberal also now had sent the police against me too and falsely.. clearly the bad guys hate it when you tell the truth about them to others.. and too bad for them.. and many bad pastors had asked me not to write to them anymore too now, for what they think they are the only one who can ask others to repent/ I often do ask them to repent instead rightfully still too.


    July 10, 2008 at 3:08 AM

  14. Truthtracker

    The question that was asked, and that I replied to, was not whether we should fight terrorism. The question was what good does it do to give people who are accused of terrorism the right to show that they are innocent. I replied that in many cases with crimes if you hold the wrong person then the right person, the real criminal, is at large.

    In other words, the procedure of trials helps us to maintain efficiency. If we have made mistakes in the arrests, and there are indications that we made many mistakes, then we should know about it. I am NOT saying, and I do NOT believe that terrorists should go free. I just believe that we should sort out the non-terrorists from the terrorists.

    You did not reply to this. All you said was that I should tell this to the relatives of those who died on 9/11. The logical answer is that YOU should seek out the relatives and tell them all that it helps us in the War on Terror to hold people who are not terrorists.

    NO! Giving the President the power to pick up some jerk in Bosnia (or any foreign place) and assert that he is a terrorist, and hold him for a military trial without any review to see whether that arrest was of a real terrorist or merely another one of hundreds of mistakes – that doesn’t help at all.


    July 14, 2008 at 12:41 AM

  15. Thanks to the too often inadequate, pretentious justice ministers indeed, to date, very few valid, major legal reforms have taken place. They rather seem all to have been piecemeal and poorly coordinated between the princes and territories too, now moreover this all has led to the implementation of such a fragmented, poor, unpredictable legal, justice systems.


    July 14, 2008 at 1:35 AM

  16. Smrstrauss-

    Well hello again. Can I ask where in my response do I say we should hold the suspected Terrorists and not do anything? The main thing I don’t want is for them to be brought here to our shores. Do you feel we should just bring them here and have trials??? Can I ask where do you think we are going to hold them? Who is to pay for these trials? Are we going to take lawyers and attorney’s away from current cases and just let our jails fill up?

    Yes we need to weed out those who are not terrorists, but as I hope you have seen, once released there have been at least several (able to be proven) that have gone back and become martyr’s themselves. So please indulge us with your ideas of how to go about this????

    God Bless,


    July 14, 2008 at 10:17 AM

Leave a Reply to thenonconformer Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: